I was not expecting Jane
Smiley’s The Greenlanders to be as complex as it was. Much like probably everyone
my age who has read this book, I picked it up due to Jonathan Franzen’s glowing
recommendation of it as one of the best novels of the last part of the 20th
century. Judging from vague notions about what Smiley’s other novels are about,
mainly her Pulitzer-Prize winning A Thousand Acres, this book, which is one of
the most difficult books I will read all year, threw me for a loop. That isn’t
to say it is a bad book or that I didn’t enjoy some parts of it, judging from
my positive review of Thomas Pynchon’s Against the Day at the start of the
year. I just didn’t expect the book to be like this, and that expectation
really influenced how I feel about this book. It is an interesting read, and a
staggering feat of the imagination, but a lot of its brilliance went over my
head, and I’m not ashamed to say it. Since most of the names in this book are
brutal tongue twisters, I will use them sparingly, but this book, which takes
place in Norse world of the 14th century, focuses on a family,
Gunnarsson’s, and the small community in Greenland who thrive with very little influence
from outside forces. The real treat is here is in the intricate pastoral setting
Smiley conjures, which is filled with rituals, storytelling, some that go one
for pages, and shocking acts of violence, the best and most unexpected
happening within a few pages, as well as the drama that comes with the lives of
people living in a tight-knit community, with a lot of the more interesting
ones coming from the priests, who control much of their society, but are not as
puritanical as you’d expect. This is a novel that swings for the fences, and
whether it not it hits all the right marks, this book deserves praise and much
more attention than it gets.
Rating: 4/5
No comments:
Post a Comment